|
I want to directly address the CTRJFS.C and their despicable use of the english language in replies to my last post. In particular, their most recent "comment" begs us to question not only their intelligence, but their belief in principles which ViD himself holds close to his heart. I dare say, would a true SVC fan desecrate the rules of grammar as you have CTRJFSV.C? For all the viewers who haven't yet read the comment, let me post it now,
"Ok now, I know that my idea to create the CTRJFS.C was creative, funny, and a damn good idea so that we don't have to listen to joseph's crap any longer. But, someone that's hard up for material(cough, cough joseph) creates this psydo-committee. I mean what kind of loser suggests that we eliminate the VID in sideshovid.com Obviously, joseph and his funny self, thought it would be a good idea. Sadly, like his blogs, joseph has gone down in flames. DOWN WITH joseph DOWN WITH joseph!!!!"
First off, what the hell are you talking about? Who said to get rid of ViD? Secondly, can we say "sentence fragment?" Furthermore, I'm pretty sure you meant pseudo (sue-do), not psydo (side-oh). As I'm sure most viewers can see, we could go on and on here picking apart the obvious fallacies found within this short, poorly functioning comment.
That must wait until later though, because now I must head out for the night. Take it easy folks.
| 